This looks like a mix of a real configuration concern and heavy framing.
If services are actually exposed, that matters—but it’s also important to separate what’s technically verified from what’s being implied here. Visibility doesn’t always equal breach.
You’re in luck … Hi! I’m Lily, and I’m writing a substack about safety and security, it sounds abit boring but I promise it’s not.. Would love you to read/like/share my latest article 👇
RDP is easy to configure against such 'weaknesses' - given that most desktops are handled via Puppet, Ansible or any number of deployment control options. Given that - it means IF found vulnerable - then it was more likely an 'inside' job. Someone with inside credentials made the changes - so that someone outside could perform the breach - and maybe even with coordination. And still with that - rules can be configured to alert if/when that occurs. This means that those performing those Illegal activites did so with management oversight... Just a thought.
I wake up every day absolutely shocked that trump and musk are not in custody… it’s hard to maintain any hope at all. These men take their impunity for granted and are breaking laws on the regular and NO ONE is holding them accountable. I’m so embarrassed to be an American 😞
The exposure of these networks represents something deeper than a security breach. It is the collapse of the illusion that complexity equals security, when in fact opacity often masks fundamental architectural flaws that competent actors already understood.
What interests me is how this mirrors what I see in organizational systems everywhere: the most vulnerable points are rarely where we think they are, but rather in the assumptions we make about what needs to remain hidden.
This was planned! It’s sad and shameful but they don’t care it’s obvious, they fired the people who could stop the attacks to our cyber infrastructure. We are all
still vulnerable one year later. Not a peep out of the media, no outrage, nothing but crickets and distractions and destruction.
lets expose tesla or how about Schmucks finances, the people should take down Schmuck(thats Ailing Schmuck), the way he took down America, in full veiw, holding the “gutting knife” with the full support of the People…?!?
A simple nslookup would tell you what domains those IP's resolve to. I realize this post is 10 months old at this point so I'm not sure why substack is still suggesting it in my feed but whatever. Just because a servers login is publicly accessible doesn't mean it's insecure. There could be legitimate access reasons. I would need to investigate to know if there is actually a problem or not.
He is the cyber espionage.
This looks like a mix of a real configuration concern and heavy framing.
If services are actually exposed, that matters—but it’s also important to separate what’s technically verified from what’s being implied here. Visibility doesn’t always equal breach.
You’re in luck … Hi! I’m Lily, and I’m writing a substack about safety and security, it sounds abit boring but I promise it’s not.. Would love you to read/like/share my latest article 👇
https://substack.com/@blackwidowsecurity/note/p-193491888?r=80mhgh&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=notes-share-action
Was this on purpose or due to lack of competency?
RDP is easy to configure against such 'weaknesses' - given that most desktops are handled via Puppet, Ansible or any number of deployment control options. Given that - it means IF found vulnerable - then it was more likely an 'inside' job. Someone with inside credentials made the changes - so that someone outside could perform the breach - and maybe even with coordination. And still with that - rules can be configured to alert if/when that occurs. This means that those performing those Illegal activites did so with management oversight... Just a thought.
If this helps to bring down this evil empire then that's good for humanity.
I wake up every day absolutely shocked that trump and musk are not in custody… it’s hard to maintain any hope at all. These men take their impunity for granted and are breaking laws on the regular and NO ONE is holding them accountable. I’m so embarrassed to be an American 😞
The exposure of these networks represents something deeper than a security breach. It is the collapse of the illusion that complexity equals security, when in fact opacity often masks fundamental architectural flaws that competent actors already understood.
What interests me is how this mirrors what I see in organizational systems everywhere: the most vulnerable points are rarely where we think they are, but rather in the assumptions we make about what needs to remain hidden.
This is all because of ELON
True. Let’s short those digits this way. Hold the wire Jamal. We bout to let Lisa feel the power.
This was planned! It’s sad and shameful but they don’t care it’s obvious, they fired the people who could stop the attacks to our cyber infrastructure. We are all
still vulnerable one year later. Not a peep out of the media, no outrage, nothing but crickets and distractions and destruction.
This sure as hell doesn’t help it scars the shit out me and should every American
lets expose tesla or how about Schmucks finances, the people should take down Schmuck(thats Ailing Schmuck), the way he took down America, in full veiw, holding the “gutting knife” with the full support of the People…?!?
This was the plan all online. Congress and the Senate must pass laws against a surveillance state.
What could go wrong?!?
A simple nslookup would tell you what domains those IP's resolve to. I realize this post is 10 months old at this point so I'm not sure why substack is still suggesting it in my feed but whatever. Just because a servers login is publicly accessible doesn't mean it's insecure. There could be legitimate access reasons. I would need to investigate to know if there is actually a problem or not.